|
Contact: |
|
|
New Studies of Bush Administration $770 Million SNF Medicare Cut Find Seniors’ Care Jeopardized, Local Jobs Lost, National and State Economies Threatened National Long Term Care Leaders Warn Illogical CMS Regulatory Action a Serious Public Policy Misstep; Seniors’ Nursing Home Benefits Take Biggest Hit in CA, FL, NY, TX, OH, IL, PA, NJ, MI, MA Washington, DC -- In releasing a new Lewin Group analysis of the Bush Administration’s $770 million cut to Medicare-financed nursing home care, national and state long term care leaders warned the regulatory-driven cuts not only jeopardize seniors’ access to quality nursing home care -- particularly in rural areas -- but also present a clear and present danger to the U.S. economy and the state and local caregiver jobs base.
[1] 42 CFR Part 413, Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Medicare Program; Prospective Payment System and Consolidated Billing for Skilled Nursing Facilities for FY 2009, p. 29-31. Rank State Total Reduction (Millions) Per Patient Day #1 California $64.9 $13.69 #2 Florida $62.3 $11.66 #3 New York $50.0 $11.12 #4 Texas $47.0 $10.34 #5 Ohio $44.8 $10.92 #6 Illinois $42.2 $11.09 #7 Pennsylvania $36.2 $10.66 #8 New Jersey $34.6 $13.09 #9 Michigan $28.7 $11.20 #10 Massachusetts $27.1 $12.01 U.S. Total $770 $11.12
“In addition to the negative impact the CMS policy will have on our economy and employment base, the regulatory changes will severely undermine the growing complex health care needs of America’s oldest, sickest seniors,” Yarwood continued. “The more lawmakers on both sides of the aisle learn about the nature and negative impact of the Bush Administration’s regulatory changes, especially as they relate to how it impacts their states’ seniors, the more we predict they will seek to halt them.” Alan Rosenbloom, President of the Alliance for Quality Nursing Home Care, said the CMS rule “will unquestionably undermine our profession’s long-standing goals of increased efficiency and effectiveness – which benefits nursing home patients, our caregiver workforce, and taxpayers alike.” In moving forward with these regulatory cuts, he continued, “CMS fails to factor-in important changes in Administration-initiated Medicare policies that, as intended, are successfully and intelligently moving large numbers of high acuity patients into skilled nursing facilities. These patients would otherwise have been cared for in a higher-cost setting – which is completely at odds with the Medicare modernization efforts America needs and that seniors deserve.” Rosenbloom said the policies now in effect saved Medicare $709 million in 2006 alone, according to a previously-released study by Avalere Health, LLC. Yarwood and Rosenbloom argued that as the nature of the nursing home patient population continues to change and evolve, it should be the policy of the federal government to help facilitate the ability of nursing homes to accommodate the care needs of higher-acuity, post-acute Medicare beneficiaries. Tony Marshall, Senior Vice President & COO of the Florida Health Care Association (FHCA) in Tallahassee, FL, said the CMS action to cut Medicare-financed nursing home care will be especially damaging to seniors in states like Florida, who, he says, have just endured substantial Medicaid funding cuts as a result of recent state legislative actions. “As a result of the CMS policy change, Florida seniors are facing the second highest Medicare funding reduction in the nation -- on top of the state Medicaid cuts passed into state law in recent weeks,” Marshall said. “Medicare and Medicaid funding are inextricably linked. The combination of cuts to both programs squeezes facilities in a manner harmful to older residents’ rising care needs, as well as to our local economy and caregiver jobs base.” Yarwood and Rosenbloom also noted that a diverse group of lawmakers – Senators Pat Roberts (R-KS), Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) – are leading the effort on Capitol Hill to reverse the proposed CMS policy. The text of the separate Roberts, Wyden and Stabenow letters are available at www.ahca.org.
### |
|